|
Article 4
|
The following are the items for competency audit carried out under Paragraph 1 or 2 of Article 19 of the Act:<br/>1. Any of the circumstances specified in Paragraph 1 of Article 28 of the Public Functionaries Ap-pointment Act.<br/>2. Persons who meet any of the conditions listed in Subparagraphs 1, 3, 8, 10 of Paragraph 1 of Article 3 of the Regulations of Special Checking the Civil Servant Related to National Security and Grand Interest.<br/>3. Individuals who have been convicted of computer misuse offenses, or who are currently wanted in unresolved cases related to such offenses.<br/>When any of the situations listed in subparagraph 1 of the preceding paragraph occurs, the audit is con-sidered failed.<br/>When circumstances described in Subparagraph 2 or 3 of Paragraph 1 arise, the government agency must send the case to its Personnel Selection and Evaluation Committee to assess the seriousness and the na-ture of the intended position, then submit the committee’s recommendation to the agency head for ap-proval. Appointments made by the head must include a written explanation of the reasons. When an audit finds a potential threat to national security or significant interests, the audit is considered failed.<br/>In the event that the government agency referred to above has not set up a Personnel Selection and Eval-uation Committee, the matter shall be handled through other appropriate meeting.<br/>Current civil servants who consider that the decisions mentioned in Paragraphs 2 and 3 are unlawful or clearly improper and have harmed their rights or interests may pursue redress under the Civil Service Protection Act. Non-current civil servants may seek relief under the Administrative Appeal Act.
|